Honda CRX Forum banner
1 - 1 of 1 Posts

· Administrator
16,557 Posts
Lmao, I love how shadowcrx immediately assumed his car was a category 1. :lol:

Seriously though, the numbers for the 89 definitely appear bloated. 89s are about the least desirable 2nd gens to me, you get none of the advantages of the 88 (rear suspension, pillar seat belts) and none of the advantages of the 90-91s (better looking body, rear discs on Si etc.)

The numbers do look accurate for my 91 dx, certainly much more so than kbb.
1 - 1 of 1 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.