Actually he said exactly this...MarkWilliamson said:Boy, those guys they interviewed really made car enthusiasts look really stupid.
"they can give me $15,000 dollars in fines! I got a credit card to pay for it!"
what a genuis. :rolleyes1:
ok ummm yeah, like you know iz like you know, nawmsang?"they're not gonna, [stutter] they're not gonna take us off the streets as much as they want to, they can give me 15 hundred, [stutter] 15 hundred thousand dollars tickets, and you know what I gotta credit card to pay'em"
After they take your car, all that happens is they turn around and sell it hella cheap at an auction to a more than likely, a less of a mature kid.Charles said:I like how some places just take your car. Problem solved.
I do like that they are catching thieves in the process. Book'em Danno!
Got no problem with that. He may not street race it knowing how he got it. And the original owner sure won't be racing it.C1R6X said:After they take your car, all that happens is they turn around and sell it hella cheap at an auction to a more than likely, a less of a mature kid.Charles said:I like how some places just take your car. Problem solved.
I do like that they are catching thieves in the process. Book'em Danno!
I don't agree at all. I don't think the government should be able to sieze your property for something like this...stolen property is one thing. It's questionable to take cars and houses away from drug dealers, because you can't prove that they acquired that stuff with drug profits...but it's possible. Street racers (generally) purchased and modified their car with their own money, not through criminal means.Charles said:I like how some places just take your car. Problem solved.
I do like that they are catching thieves in the process. Book'em Danno!
Then take their license away, not their car. That's a valid punishment, just like the ones you listed...not seizing their personal property. If a child molester lives near a school when he is convicted, even if he uses his house to commit the crimes, he can sell his house and buy a new one...they don't seize his house and leave him homeless.MarkWilliamson said:Same way felons can't own handguns.
Same way child molesters can't live near schools.
It's not about whether it's more *effective* to take his car away, it's about whether it's OK for the government to take someone's personal property, worth thousands of dollars, to do so. When someone commits a crime, they do their time, or pay the fine, or whatever, and we as a society take our chances on him commiting the crime again. We try to match the punishment to the crime so that once a criminal has paid his due, he thinks twice about doing it again. There are societies that cut a thief's hands off to stop him from stealing again...as much as I hate theives (and I really do), I don't think our government has any place cutting off people's hands for it...same story here -- I'll take the increased chance of a guy racing again to avoid giving the government the power to take his car away as part of the punishment. There are always people that will do it again, no matter WHAT the punishment is...look at the guys who get out of prison after 10 years and steal a car or hold up a liquor store 2 weeks later. You can't stop that, no matter what the punishment.MarkWilliamson said:A fair argument, but not completely convincing. If part of the known punishment for street racing conviction is car seizures, it would most certainly cut down on street racing.
Now, when you get down to it, what good is a car without a license?
So what you're saying is that we, as a society, should take away merely the thing that gives him the legal privilege to drive (his license), rather than the thing he actually drives (his car)?
Which do you think would be more effective at prevent him from street racing again?
Problem solved? Really depends on what you call the problem.Dodo said:Here's an idea, take the car and have them pay for it again. If they cant, then sell it to the highest bidder. Problem solved. You still make the money, but you give him a chance to buy it back.
The bigger problem is they dont show those good movies in schools anymore. Blood on the highway, red Road. Those would open there eyes. Maybe if they knew they were in a death car ( not bashing, but they dont make cars like they use to) they would learn something.
Some of this is bull. Some of the older people on here, not that me have many, could tell us how they did the same thing back in the 70's. Go to the beach, show off your car, have some beers. Then some would go to an old back road, and drag. So its nothing new but it seems more and more of a unapproved choice to spend your time. People like this are the reason we have cops watching us drink coffee at starbucks. Were doing nothing wrong, but still get watched like dogs. Its all nothing new and its not going to get old soon. Its something we will have to live with for at least the next ten years.
Amen to Ryan..ryan_long_01 said:It's not about whether it's more *effective* to take his car away, it's about whether it's OK for the government to take someone's personal property, worth thousands of dollars, to do so. When someone commits a crime, they do their time, or pay the fine, or whatever, and we as a society take our chances on him commiting the crime again. We try to match the punishment to the crime so that once a criminal has paid his due, he thinks twice about doing it again. There are societies that cut a thief's hands off to stop him from stealing again...as much as I hate theives (and I really do), I don't think our government has any place cutting off people's hands for it...same story here -- I'll take the increased chance of a guy racing again to avoid giving the government the power to take his car away as part of the punishment. There are always people that will do it again, no matter WHAT the punishment is...look at the guys who get out of prison after 10 years and steal a car or hold up a liquor store 2 weeks later. You can't stop that, no matter what the punishment.MarkWilliamson said:A fair argument, but not completely convincing. If part of the known punishment for street racing conviction is car seizures, it would most certainly cut down on street racing.
Now, when you get down to it, what good is a car without a license?
So what you're saying is that we, as a society, should take away merely the thing that gives him the legal privilege to drive (his license), rather than the thing he actually drives (his car)?
Which do you think would be more effective at prevent him from street racing again?